First introduced by Taiichi Ohno, the legendary & brilliant Japanese manager-turned-consultant behind Just-in-time System of Inventory Management, it is a continuous process applicable in all functions and levels of Business that involves finding and implementing best practices (any where) in all areas that influence customer satisfaction. It is helpful in management as it provides new ideas and conviction to implement those ideas.
According to Wikipedia, Taiichi Ohno was a prominent Japanese businessman. He is considered to be the father of the Toyota Production System, which became Lean Manufacturing in the U.S. He wrote several books about the system, the most popular of which is Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Born in Dalian, China, and a graduate of the Nagoya Technical High School (Japan), he was an employee first of the Toyoda family's Toyoda Spinning, moved to the motor company in 1943, and gradually rose through the ranks to become an executive. In what is considered to be a slight, possibly because he spoke publicly about the production system, he was denied the normal executive track and was sent instead to consult with suppliers in his later career.
Ohno's principles influenced areas outside of manufacturing, and have been extended into the service arena. For example, the field of sales process engineering has shown how the concept of Just-In-Time (JIT) can improve sales, marketing, and customer service processes.
Once decided to use, Benchmarking involves using a model organization against which our own organization is reflected upon to find areas of action.
Benchmarking as proposed by Taiichi Ohno involves three vital steps- Analysis, Comparison and Synthesis. Analysis: An issue under consideration is dissected – dismantled, to arrive at the various constituents that go into making of that Issue; shall we use an industrial term here Components. Comparison: The constituents or components thus found are compared with those of the model already selected. The differences or the gaps thus obtained provide the basis for next step. Synthesis: The ideas that emerge in the Comparison stage are examined for affinity between them and using those ideas which collectively fuzz together a sense of direction emerges that becomes the guiding force.
In essence the direction thus determined becomes a collective idea based upon the out side realities rather than an insider’s gut feel. This very fact helps drive change in belief systems, behaviors and achieve a desirable focus of respective teams.
Based on the need different organizations may follow one are all forms of this tool: Strategic Benchmarking; Product Benchmarking; Process Benchmarking and Performance Benchmarking.